As
I mentioned in the previous blog, ethics nowadays is an emerged topic. Every
organization despite how large or how small it is, ethic practices are the most
concerned in the way it is doing business. The most obvious reason is that it
doesn’t want to be boycotted by the consumers. However, it is hard to balance
between ethical practices and standing profitable. It is because on the way to
approach ethical conduct, it might cost some of the revenue which gained by
organization. Some of the aviation organizations in US are examples.
According
to Patterson, 2012, standard coach seat for low cost airlines widths range from
17 to 19 inches between the armrests. Due to the reason of “the seat is a
revenue generator”, those organizations are trying to maximize their revenue by
designing 3 seats in each side on the aircraft. Besides that, a vice president
of seat manufacturer stated that the seats are closer together and researcher
of human body measurement, Kathleen Robinette, said that the Americans are
getting bigger for the three decades. Meanwhile the customer’s comfort is being
compromised when purchasing low fare flight.
On
the other hand, one of the aviation companies, Southwest Airlines, in US was
faced to an issue of discrimination. According to Chang and Stuart et al, 2012, Southwest questioned two
passengers about their weight in the presence of more than 100 others, and they
were requested the two passengers to step out the flight because of the reason:
”too fat to fly”. Besides that, in 2013, a passenger name Matthew Harper who
weighs 154 kg was asked to step off the flight from Chicago with a reason of
overbooking. In fact, the main reason was that this gentleman is over
size. Besides that, Mr. Harper reported
that there were two people who even bigger than him but they were not refused
to board in. It made him “felt like a criminal” (Kim, 2013). Those actions were
criticized. Currently, it has “Customer of size” policy and those oversized
passengers have to pay 2 seats per one ticket. The reason for that policy is
that oversized customer will disturb the neighbor passengers by encroach the
armrests.
As
discussed earlier, passengers who purchase cheap flights compromise their
comfort on the air. It means that the bigger body size, the lesser comfortable
on the flight for the customers. The discussion can be started from those
issues. Due to the positioning of low fare airline, Southwest has to minimize
the cost and maximize the revenue in order for it to survive sustainability.
Therefore, tightening seat space compare to other full service airlines is
acceptable and it is nothing wrong for doing that because the “seat is the
revenue generator”. However, Southwest charge double seat for those who
oversize because the reason of disturbing from them to neighbor passengers by
encroach the armrests. It might lead to dissatisfy for both oversize customer
and the neighbor. Is it ethic for the airline to do so? If this aviation
company double charge for “too fat to fly” customers, it will be claimed as a
discrimination action. If the airline doesn’t take any action on this problem, it
might bring dissatisfaction to those neighbors. It’s a dilemma for the
Southwest on this ethical issue.
As
an individual who figures out and understands the situation, I found out that
there always has a solution for any dilemmas. It’s just only how people choose
the way to deal with them. Agree that in order to pursue low cost positioning, Southwest
must have strategy to minimize the cost and maximize the revenue; nevertheless,
double charge is not the only way to keep satisfaction for the neighbor guests
and bring comfortable for overweight customers. Due to the Americans are
getting bigger in those three decades, it means that number of overweight
people are increased. Therefore, Southwest can redesign by adding the
additional inserted part on the two line seats which next to the walkway on the
aircraft. When there is any oversize customer board in, the flight attendants
assist them by inserting the additional part of seat for them without any
charges. Although it mays cost the airline, it can help to enhance the service
as well as improve the low cost airline image for the company. Besides that, this
brings ethical image for the company as well.
Sometimes,
simple method can help to solve the problem which may be hard to solve. In this
situation, just adding the inserted space for the seat, Southwest can deal with
the problem which considers as the dilemma. This innovation enables the
organization doing business in this situation in the most ethical practice.
References
Patterson, T. 2012. Airline squeeze: It's not you,
'it's the seat'. [online] Available at:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/30/travel/airline-seats [Accessed: 28 Jun 2013].
CHANG, J., STUART, E., EFFRON, L. and HAWKINS, S. 2012. 'Too Fat To Fly'
Passenger Sues Southwest Airlines For 'Discriminatory Actions'. abcnews, [online] May 3, 2012.
Available at: abcnews.go,com [Accessed: 18 June, 2013].
Kim, S. 2013. Man
Claims He Was Kicked Off A Southwest Airlines Flight For Being Too Fat Read
more: http://www.businessinsider.com/man-kicked-off-flight-for-being-too-fat-2013-4#ixzz2WSzACqUH.
[online] Available at:
http://www.businessinsider.com/man-kicked-off-flight-for-being-too-fat-2013-4
[Accessed: 17 Jun 2013].
No comments:
Post a Comment